Showing posts with label rants. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rants. Show all posts

Monday, October 19, 2009

Different

Black-capped Chickadee, sky abstract

Canon 7d, 70-200f2.8L IS, Handheld, 1/640th, f8.0, ISO 100

This is a rather atypical wildlife shot for me. It falls very much in to the "art" realm of my imagery. I've seen this kind of image (atypical framing and lighting, no distinct subject, but telling something of a story) fairly regularly in the fine art photography blogs and web sites. Most of my work falls into more classic structure. Yet I still kind of like this one. It's different, I don't feel like I've seen the image before, it tells a story and provides some scale. With increasing demand for atypical imagery, perhaps this kind of work has a future...

On another topic entirely, I'm currently reading David duChemin's book "Within the Frame". It is an excellent read, not about the technology of photography, but about vision. There are a million books out there on how to operate a camera, how to expose, depth of field, and other very teachable subjects. However, there are VERY few books on how to see. "Within the Frame" is one, "The Inner Game of Outdoor Photography" by Galen Rowell is another. So is the "Tao of Photography" by Gross and Shapiro. Teaching how to see, teaching art, is extremely difficult but learning it is even harder. These writers provide some insight into their techniques. I highly recommend you read them all. Carefully. And over and over again.

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Iconic Images and Boredom

Canon 40d, 70-200mm f2.8 L, at 155mm
1/400th sec, f4.0, ISO 100.

I'm not sure who made this image first. Not this exact image, of course, I made this one. But I'm referring to the original. The first of the iconic "Bear catching salmon" shots. I think every serious photographer who has visited Brooks Camp in Katmai National Park has some rendition of this photo. And I'm confused by that.

Why is it that we struggle to imitate the classic images of the places we visit? In Denali, its Mt. McKinley over Wonder Lake from Ansel Adams Point, or Denali in Reflection Pond. Both of those standards were, of course, set by Adams himself. There are the Tetons with the Snake River, and the Grand Canyon from the South Rim, Monument Valley from the East, and of course Katmai Brown Bear catching salmon in the air at Brooks Falls.

When I made this image, I was standing next to another photographer, a teched-out fella who rolled up to the viewing platform dragging two suitcases loaded with gear, took over a good portion of the upper level with his cases and then bull-dogged his way into the prime viewing spot to set up, pushing tourists aside with flying elbows as he passed. When I found my way next to him I cracked some joke about making the salmon jumping/bear catching image and how strange it is we all want that image. He replied with braggadocio, "I'VE got more than a dozen!". Wow, I thought, not only is he an ass, but he's a boring ass as well.

But why is it that we want those images? We tick them off like some kind of photo-destination checklist. And I do it too. I've got the shot of Denali from Reflection Pond and the Grand Canyon and now the bear and salmon from Katmai. These images aren't marketable, there are thousands of them already out there with stock agencies, and publishers have seen the image so many times they are bored. Rightfully so too. Of the hundreds of images of bears I have from Katmai, this isn't my favorite. I like it OK, but I like it because it gets a rise from viewers. It always gets a wow, or a gasp. I think it gets this response because they've seen the image before and think it must take some great skill to get it. Trust me it doesn't. It's damn easy in fact. Set up your tripod, adjust exposure, compose, and shoot when the salmon jumps. Click, click, click. Done. No long glass required. This, as you can see in the photo information above was only at 155mm. But its what people think it takes that matters. Ah yes, the magic of photography.

I suppose we try for these shots because someone else did the thinking for us. We didn't have to come up with the composition on our own, we just had to frame and execute. Same with the great landscape shots, we just copy and click. This of course, is also why none of the copies are as good as the original. I know quite well that this is far from the best image made of of a Katmai Bear and its prey. The light ain't that great, the sharpness isn't exactly perfect, there is some motion blur... Like a tape that has been copied a dozen times, it doesn't retain the same depth or freshness of the original. Still, I'm glad I've got it. It gets the "wow"s at slideshows, and makes everyone think I must be some kind of expert. And I'm happy to perpetuate that particular myth.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

A Short Rant

A few days back I posted a short and somewhat humorous piece from the Colbert Report about a poor chap who was arrested by Amtrak rent-a-cops for taking photos of trains for an Amtrak photo contest. Well today, care of "A Photo Editor" I found a much less funny example from across the Atlantic. England has just passed laws that allow the arrest of photographers and confiscation of their equipment if there is reason to suspect that their images could be used in the planning of terrorist attacks.


Photographers Rights UK from Nick Turpin on Vimeo.

It's madness I tell you! And another warning to stay vigilant about our rights on this side of the pond.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Funny, but not really.

I just stumbled on this video from the Colbert Report. Humorous, but not really when you think of what this means in terms of photographic freedom.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Follow-up to Ticked Off.

I was pleased today to see the Anchorage Daily News had excellent editorial about the recent dust-up in Juneau over funding at UAF. They express disappointment (though honestly I would have preferred a bit of outrage), over both Rep. Fairclough's absurd questioning and President Hamilton's lackadaisical, and rather silly, response. Check out the editorial HERE.

Oh, and I promise, my next post will be about photography.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Ticked Off.

So don't say I didn't warn you. I made it three whole posts without broaching controversial topics. But this was too much to pass up:

According to Mark Hamilton, the president of the University of Alaska, conservationists need to "mature". He was questioned by one of Alaska's illustrious representitive (Anna Fairclough, a Republican from Eagle River) about why the the state should increase funding for the university when most of the students are anti-development. Hamilton replied that really UAF faculty and students are as conservative as they come and and that those that aren't will grow up and mature to see the "real world".

So Mark Hamilton thinks I'm immature for believing it is not ultimately in our best interest to rape and pillage the planet for every dime of profit we can squeeze out of it.

Well right now, I'm sticking my tongue out at him. So There!